Difference between revisions of "Editor's information/Page Structures"

From Valve Cut Content
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by 蔣介石 (talk) to last revision by Uncanny)
(Tag: Rollback)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
美國、英國和澳大利亞領導人在 9 月 15 日的聯合聲明中宣佈建立增強的三邊安全夥伴關係——AUKUS。根據該協議，美國和英國將幫助澳大利亞確定建立一個加強型三邊安全夥伴關係的最佳途徑。超過 18 個月的核動力潛艇艦隊。澳大利亞希望在美國和英國的支持下，在阿德萊德建造至少八艘核動力潛艇。
+
==Page Structures==
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
A list of semi-standardized page structures. They might fit with what you are trying to write.
−
對於神經不應該也不能保持不受干擾的地區國家來說，這筆交易絕非小事。各方在宣布後立即通過電話進行解釋和保證，不會模糊地區國家看到背後戰略計算的願景。嚴重的後果肯定會出現，以下三個可能是最重要的。
+
The bullet point levels are representative of the header levels.
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
===<b>"Evolution" Structure</b>===
−
一旦規則被打破，第一個後果將是造成核擴散的巨大風險。
+
 
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
<b>Overview:</b>
−
雖然美國、英國和澳大利亞的言論從未缺席以規則為基礎的秩序，但它們本身卻是實際和最大的規則破壞者。
+
 
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
*Second-level headers are used to divide into "sections" of the particular thing's evolution.
−
《核不擴散條約》（NPT）是國際核裁軍與控制機制的基石，是全球安全最基本的規則之一。然而，作為受NPT約束的核武器國家，美國和英國決定向無核武器國家澳大利亞提供可用於製造核武器的高濃縮鈾（HEU）。
+
**Third-level headers are used after, to show what we have of that particular revision.
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
*Including final versions is optional, but usually beneficial.
−
這是對《不擴散核武器條約》精神的赤裸裸的背叛，也是對核不擴散國際多邊規則最嚴重的違反，使澳大利亞失去了自稱擁有“模範不擴散證書”的國家的聲譽。
+
 
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
<b>Works best with:</b>
−
國際原子能機構 (IAEA) 對海軍反應堆沒有保障措施，這與核動力潛艇通常被視為軍事機密。因此，國際原子能機構沒有辦法阻止澳大利亞撤回核材料並將其用於製造核武器。三方不得利用《不擴散核武器條約》和國際原子能機構保障措施的漏洞作為謀求一己私利的藉口。
+
 
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
Articles with a long and notable history. Otherwise, an early version might fit better as a "notable aspect" header.
−
三方聲稱遵守最高的防擴散標準，已將最新進展告知國際原子能機構，並承諾在未來幾個月內這樣做。然而，事實上，國際原子能機構幾乎不可能，即使不是完全不可能，也幾乎不可能對潛艇的情況進行有效核查，同時對高度敏感的軍事數據嚴格保密。這意味著美國和英國將在沒有可靠驗證的情況下向澳大利亞移交大量高濃鈾。如此一來，全球核裁軍與防擴散努力就會出現巨大漏洞，核擴散風險將大大增加。
+
 
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
<b>Examples:</b>
−
第二個後果是加劇地區軍備競賽，迫使地區國家滑入新冷戰的滑坡。
+
 
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
*[[Combine Soldier (Evolution)]]
−
美國聲稱沒有將與中國的“激烈競爭”變成“新冷戰”的說法是虛偽的，因為它的行動實際上是在反其道而行之。
+
*[[Metropolice (Evolution)]]
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
 
−
作為公認的進攻性武器戰略平台，核潛艇可以成為各種先進進攻性武器的運載工具。除了組建核動力艦隊外，澳大利亞還宣布了從美國購買戰斧巡航導彈的計劃，這些導彈可能會部署在其核潛艇上。
+
===<b>"Timeline" Structure</b>===
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
<b>Headers:</b>
−
這些事態發展表明，三方決心在該地區製造緊張局勢和分裂，以便將亞太地區變成一個競爭的舞台。有了AUKUS的先例，其他一些地區國家，特別是那些潛在的核潛艇擁有者，會受到很大的鼓舞，因此更有可能效仿。值得提醒的是，日本自民黨黨魁選舉的四位候選人中，有兩位已經暗示日本考慮擁有一艘核潛艇。
+
 
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
*Major events (or years) serve as level 1 headers, dividing events.
−
不幸的是，該地區加劇的軍備競賽不會是美國想要關心的事情。一個持續緊張的地區是它所喜歡的。這樣的地區格局會帶來利潤豐厚的軍火工業，更重要的是，可能會為乾涉地區事務提供更好的藉口。然而，將受到傷害的是我們的地區國家。冷戰結束30年來，AUKUS將良好的外部環境作為東亞幾十年繁榮的根本因素置於巨大的壓力之下。如果不及時剎車，該地區就有可能被迫忍受一場新的、風暴般的冷戰。
+
**Individual days where events occur serve as level 2 headers.
−
<pre style="color: red">WARNING SEA WATER CIRULATING WATER TROUBLE WARNING</pre>
+
**Individual events are laid out below the days with bullet points.
−
第三個後果是削弱東盟的中心地位並擾亂東亞合作。
+
*At the very end, a header for references is included.
−
<pre style="color: yellow">WARNING CONTINUED OPERATIONS OF THE MULTINATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA MUST END, WE SEEK DESTRUCTION FOR NO COMPLIANCE</pre>
+
 
−
而美國
+
<b>Works best with:</b>
 +
 
 +
Large, multi-month events, with smaller bits scattered over multiple days.
 +
 
 +
<b>Examples:</b>
 +
 
 +
*[[Timeline_of_Leaks_(Facepunch-Era)]]
 +
 
 +
===<b>"Weapon" Structure</b>===
 +
<b>Headers:</b>
 +
 
 +
*First, a brief description of what the weapon is, with the weapon name in bold. I.E.:
 +
<blockquote>
 +
The <b>XM29 OICW</b> is the effective predecessor to the OSPIR. It is still in use in the leak, and thus fully present.
 +
</blockquote>
 +
*Two level two headers:
 +
**Overview
 +
**Tactics
 +
**Further case-by-case headers, documenting notable aspects of the weapon. I.E.:
 +
***Older Texture
 +
***Cut Grenade Launching Function
 +
***Facepunch Leaks
 +
*Another level-two header gallery, with dividing subheaders something like this:
 +
**Screenshots
 +
**Renders
 +
**Textures
 +
*A header for references. (If used!)
 +
 
 +
<b>Works best with:</b>
 +
 
 +
*Articles documenting weapons. The general idea of it can be applied elsewhere, though.
 +
 
 +
<b>Examples:</b>
 +
 
 +
*[[AK-47 (AR1)]]
 +
*[[Heavy Machine Gun (HMG1)]]
 +
*[[MP5K (SMG1)]]
 +
*[[XM29 OICW (AR2)]]

Latest revision as of 07:51, 8 October 2021

Page Structures

A list of semi-standardized page structures. They might fit with what you are trying to write. The bullet point levels are representative of the header levels.

"Evolution" Structure

Overview:

  • Second-level headers are used to divide into "sections" of the particular thing's evolution.
    • Third-level headers are used after, to show what we have of that particular revision.
  • Including final versions is optional, but usually beneficial.

Works best with:

Articles with a long and notable history. Otherwise, an early version might fit better as a "notable aspect" header.

Examples:

"Timeline" Structure

Headers:

  • Major events (or years) serve as level 1 headers, dividing events.
    • Individual days where events occur serve as level 2 headers.
    • Individual events are laid out below the days with bullet points.
  • At the very end, a header for references is included.

Works best with:

Large, multi-month events, with smaller bits scattered over multiple days.

Examples:

"Weapon" Structure

Headers:

  • First, a brief description of what the weapon is, with the weapon name in bold. I.E.:

The XM29 OICW is the effective predecessor to the OSPIR. It is still in use in the leak, and thus fully present.

  • Two level two headers:
    • Overview
    • Tactics
    • Further case-by-case headers, documenting notable aspects of the weapon. I.E.:
      • Older Texture
      • Cut Grenade Launching Function
      • Facepunch Leaks
  • Another level-two header gallery, with dividing subheaders something like this:
    • Screenshots
    • Renders
    • Textures
  • A header for references. (If used!)

Works best with:

  • Articles documenting weapons. The general idea of it can be applied elsewhere, though.

Examples:

Retrieved from "https://vcc.wiki/internal/w/index.php?title=Editor%27s_information/Page_Structures&oldid=9279"